Forum / 1. General Discussion / Intercity Express Programme - comments please
Reply Subscribe Start new thread Syndicated Feed (RSS)
| Displaying 1 to 3 of 3 | Previous 1 Next |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
baard Posts: 43 |
Is there a better alternative - maybe electrifiying the branch-offs to eliminate diesel use, or buying a new fleet of dedicated electric trains for the electrified routes, and a fleet of diesel trains for then non electrified branches? How about Virgin style diesel drags at the Northern end of the ECML for Aberdeen and nverness services? Share your thoughts here. |
||
| Back to top | |||
|
heatonj
Posts: 3 Location: |
Any thoughts on specification of IEP? Want to share your views with others. Will 'just' 2000KW (@ 2680hp) diesel power match a current HST timings on the non-electrified routes? |
||
| Back to top | View user profile Contact this member | ||
|
Namara
Posts: 6 Location: West Somerset, UK |
Intrinsically it seems wrong to contemplate a drag for c45% of a journey ie Edinburgh to Inverness. Loco hauled stock appears more appropriate ie electric Kings X to Edinburgh and diesel Edinburgh to Inverness. The argument for Aberdeen is similar although less compelling timewise. Or is this simply a view from a misguided "kettle man". Re Dawlish, I thought intended electrification was Paddington - Bristol - S Wales corridor. As for electrification and tides, does the level reach the overhead wires? We certainly do not have waves like that in the Bristol Channel [or Severn Sea as the Victorians called it]. John, I think you need contributions from those members and readers more safely installed within the twenty first century rather than one still wrestling with the previous century's decisions. However it does seem to me that there is an inherant danger in what appears to be an evolving "one fits all strategy" Michael Rowe, Member for Porlock, |
||
| Back to top | View user profile Contact this member |